Forums > Electric Guitar > ESP LTD MH-250 vs. ESP LTD M-400
Jump:
Forums > Electric Guitar > ESP LTD MH-250 vs. ESP LTD M-400
Original message:493 days 23 hours ago
0  
Member: shambolic
0
WebCred
Ok, so.. I'm planning to buy a new guitar, which should be good..
I've narrowed my options down to two: ESP'S guitars mh-250 and m-400.
Both of those guitars have licensed floyd rose's.
And what about the mics.. Do the make a remarkable difference?

So people, if anyone of you has any experience from these guitars, please comment and
list some good and bad qualities from the guitars.
For example is there any difference between the sounds, or is the other one better with a bit more classical music etc..
Has the agathy body on the mh-250 any impact on the sound? Cuz m-400 is made out of alder..

All information is useful for me so please, if you have any experience from there guitars help me out!! :D

My price range has to be around 500 - 700 euros.. (I can't afford more! :D)
Reply:488 days 17 hours 29 minutes ago
Member: Buck
    0  
26
WebCred
Your first major difference is in the body styles. While they look similar, the MH-250 is an "arch top" style where the body raises up in the middle while the M-400 is a flat top. Myself, I do not like arch top guitars..the edge of the body tends to dig into my forearm and leaves a sore spot after awhile. While it's flat, the M-400 does have a bevel where your forearm should go and I find them very comfortable to play.

According to my ESP catalog, the M-400 is made of alder and not mahogany. There is a BIG difference in body woods. Agathis is a lower-end wood and has a lesser tone response. Alder is a balanced wood lending to somewhat balanced tones.

Your biggest difference in the two is the pickups. The MH-250 uses ESP pickups designed by EMG. While the name EMG can excite you they may not be what you think they are. Jackson uses alot of Duncan Designed pups in their gits but while they're made to Duncan's specs, they are NOT Duncan pups and the tone is proof. The M-400 uses EMG active pickups, and here's where everything changes. Active pickups use a battery to supply power and while some people don't like this, tone-wise they are hard to beat. They're bright and have an excellent overall response.

The neck shapes have a large impact, too. The M-250 has a "thin U" shape while the M-400 is "Extra thin." This means that by rights the M-400 should be much easier to play.

I can tell you alot of other things but in the end what you have to do is try them both and decide which one YOU like the best.
My music recommendations:
Reply:488 days 4 hours 40 minutes ago
Member: shambolic
    0  
0
WebCred
Thanks a lot for the reply! And yes, you're right about the body thing (mahogany/alder) and I'll fix that.. :D
But thx really for all the tips and stuff. You gave me a lot to think about.
Jump:
Contact us   |   Spread the word   |   Interested in Advertising   |   Provide Content
© 2008 Guitar.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Guitar.com, Guitardotcom and the logo, are service marks of Guitar.com, LLC.