Forums > Music Theory > Does Thery Stump your growth
Jump:
Forums > Music Theory > Does Thery Stump your growth
Original message:98 days 4 hours 28 minutes ago
+ 6  
Member: The Rocker
977
WebCred
I have a problem with theory and technical exercises, although I can see the advantages of learning theory and using technical exercises they can get in the way of development, whats the point of playing every scale and exercise that you will never use in a musical way, I'm not really a metal guitarist.
I think it is just as important to build a set list than to just devote all your practise to theory and technical exercises. I find it hard to practise the things people say you should, and find it a lot more satisfying developing a song list. I'm at the intermediate level where getting to the next stage is becoming harder and harder. is there a next level or is that it ?. I find using theory as a springboard to melodies or lead work a very sterile environment. maybe because in a rock sense I'm trapped in a cliche world of past players from the old school rockers from a bygone era. I find the very technical playing to be a bit of a put off because of how much work is involved, come on whats it gonna take. my point is you can get trapped with the theory and exercises. has anyone else got this problem with it.....
My music recommendations:
Does Humour Belong in Music.
Reply:98 days 4 hours 2 minutes ago
Member: jobabrinks
    + 6  
997
WebCred
I agree with you. And I've pretty much approached the guitar much like you. Learning songs has always been my biggest commitment. And I've never really listened to shred guitar, so I have no need for crazy technical skills. But...

Technical exercises give you the ability to play a variety of things at a certain level. I eschewed technical exercises for such a long time that my chops were always well below my musicality (which isnt that great, ha). Which doesnt mean you need to run all the modes in groups, of 5, 6, and 9. A lot of guitarists start out listening to Steve Vai, Eric Johnson, etc. Trying to cop those licks is the equivalent of a technical exercise.

As far as the theory, it's not really necessary for blues/rock. Stevie and Jimi didnt know crap about theory. But, it's essential for jazz, IMO. It's so much easier to see the improv patterns when you know your scales and arps.

Also, hard work doesnt necessarily lead to high technical playing. Many great players I know (former teachers, players, etc) cannot play at a high technical level, but their musicality is through the roof. Meanwhile, there's always a new 16 year old at Guitar Center who can shred like Malmsteen. I think chops to an extent is either born with it or not.

Once again, just my HO...
Reply:98 days 3 hours 47 minutes ago
Member: Rary
    + 4  
56
WebCred
well, I used to be a lot more in to blues and rock when i started playing, and when i started learning theory I thought the same thing, but when you know so many songs, and you develop your own style, you start thinking past scales and modes and all of that. The only time I use my theoretical knowledge is when I am writing a lead or melody for something, and I really want to get a certain feel or mood across.
The key, in my opinion, is knowing theory, but not necessarily relying on it/using it 100% of the time.
I find it just makes figuring songs out easier, you can really pinpoint what theyre doing if you know your scales, because you realize what the arist is using.
As much as I know rock/blues styled music is based around the pentatonic scale, and I know a lot of players who once they learnt the pentatonic scales they stopped trying to learn anything, it makes it, in my opinion, so that almost all of the music created has the same feel.
What knowledge of theory does is it enables you to create different sounding songs, and makes your music more diverse.
Of course if you're not in to that, then of course there's no point.
As much as i respect people that can shred, I find that just because you can shred doesn't mean anything, i find a lot of shredders don't have a lot of musicality they rely on spewing up scales that sound like nothing.
Anyways thats my opinion
My music recommendations:
How many Guitarists does it take to Screw in a lightbulb? Ten. One to do it, and nine others to sit at the back of the room with their arms crossed and tal about how they could do it better.
Reply:98 days 3 hours 34 minutes ago
Member: jobabrinks
    + 4  
997
WebCred
I agree with a lot of that. Especially the figuring out songs part. When youre playing rock/blues, you do know theory, but its more on an intuitive level, not really book theory. Once you get to a jazz level, you almost have to study it to some degree in a book sense unless youre an ear genius. When I first tried to figure out jazz chords by ear before I knew some theory and my ear developed, I could sit there for hours on end and listen to the same song and pretty much transcribe every chord wrong. I would also transcribe solos and have no idea how they made sense theoretically. They were just a random group of notes, so it would be impossible to remember them unless I played it 100x and just learned it with muscle memory.

Of course it never ends. A lot of stuff still seems like a bunch of random notes to me, Coltrane, etc...
Reply:98 days 3 hours 8 minutes ago
Member: The Rocker
    + 4  
977
WebCred
I agree with what you say regarding working things out, it does help to that extent. maybe its me but the three notes per string stuff is kind of metal inspired and all the scales I play are in that format well major scales/modes anyways. I find it really difficult to develop melodies when I think scales. I am trying to bridge the gap between scale noodling and phrasing melodies, this is an area I am working on at the moment I think the key is to understand the mood of the scale, to get a specific affect. which takes time to develop. most of the music I am into is classic blues rock like Hendrix Led zep the who ACDC etc. its amazing how important the pentatonics are, lots of people have written them off for some reason in favor of the more jazz derived modes etc. but to my ears people like Blackamoor Hendrix and Page are more appealing. look at the way Hendrix played, it's very odd in some respects, look at the electric ladyland instrumental it's mind boggling, Castles Made of Sand and Little Wing. most of his stuff is. its just incredible considering how long ago it was. there is more to hear in this type of music than the shred stuff.
My music recommendations:
Does Humour Belong in Music.
Reply:97 days 22 hours 54 minutes ago
Member: Hale
    + 3  
328
WebCred
I rarely practice scales/theory....I usually learn/write songs. And I think that, the better you get, the more you naturally aquire theory and technical skills.
My music recommendations:
Reply:97 days 13 hours 32 minutes ago
Member: Hippieway
    + 5  
1180
WebCred
I play a lot and practise rarely. I wish I had the will to practise more and to pick up more theory and I'm always interested in the posts here the delve into theory and I always pick up some things to try out but I never go as far as I should so while my playing ability is growing the improvements can be measured glacially. I'll get stuck in ruts for long periods and I know that if I understood more and practiced more that my playing would get better faster and more interesting. So I understand where The Rocker is coming from, but I am so not interested in what everyone else has done or is doing all I really care about is my style and my songs.
My gear recommendations:
  
Reply:97 days 11 hours 42 minutes ago
Member: dcunning30
    + 4  

3017
WebCred
Learning theory and working on your technique are not necessary, but they do add more tools to your musical toolbelt. The more you know how to do, the more choices you have when you're composing songs, jamming, playing with others, etc. If you're satisfied with the tools in your musical toolbelt, then more power to you. But others may enjoy / desire to amass a larger number of musical tools.

Fore example, I work out playing scales in intervals. I start out playing my scales in 3rds, up and down in all positions, then I do them in 4th, then 5ths, etc. These exercizes are BORING!!!!!! But whan I gain is precision, dexterity, finger independence. So when I'm maiking music, I may throw this ascending pattern of 6ths right here and that'll make this passage more interesting. I wouldn't have been able to , or even known to do this unless I did those boring exercizes.
My music recommendations:
Reply:97 days 9 hours ago
Member: The Rocker
    + 4  
977
WebCred
Good point DC, I do similar things because it can help you to be more creative.
My music recommendations:
Does Humour Belong in Music.
Reply:97 days 11 hours 23 minutes ago
Member: Hippieway
    + 5  
1180
WebCred
No argument here, I know practice helps and I know theory helps, I just have such a hard time doing it. Sometimes I'll sit down and actually practice scales but instead of following it up the next day and the next, I just blow it off and play. I'm a believer but the discipline is lacking.
My gear recommendations:
  
Reply:97 days 11 hours 16 minutes ago
Member: dcunning30
    + 4  

3017
WebCred
I'm with you. It's a chore. BORING!!!!! Maybe do your exercized while watching TV. I used to do that alot, but now too many members of my household complain that I'm disturbing them.
My music recommendations:
Reply:97 days 9 hours 49 minutes ago
Member: evol666
    + 3  
374
WebCred
The Rocker - I hear what you are saying, but do think learning at least basic music theory has *huge* advantages. First being that knowledge is power. I am talking about knowing simple things like being able to play a chord by its name, knowing scales (major, minor), and basics like what a relative minor is. The key is to take that musical knowledge and make it your own. Being self taught on guitar, my playing and songwriting advanced exponentially after taking a level one music theory class in college. The accompanying lab, ear training and sight singing, was tough, but very rewarding. I never appreciated this until I started working with singers and other so called musicians that did not have this basic knowledge. You have to dumb everything down. I also think this type of knowledge goes towards being musical.
My gear recommendations:
  
One thing you don't do is let the singer have creative input on any fucking thing, because they're useless - Noel Gallagher
Reply:97 days 8 hours 51 minutes ago
Member: The Rocker
    + 3  
977
WebCred
I hear you evol, the point im trying to make is, I consider myself to have a reasonable grasp of theory, in as much to say I know most of the common scales and associated chords, I play drills like sequences etc. but you can get wrapped up in this too much and neglect the making music part.
My music recommendations:
Does Humour Belong in Music.
Reply:97 days 8 hours 29 minutes ago
Member: frumsapap
    + 2  
1695
WebCred
I have a tendency to learn new a new set of theory or scales and leave the learning for a while until I have incorporated it into my playing. To me learning all the scales, and all the chords you can is not necessarily the best way. If I can't incorporate it into my playing then why am I learning it in the first place? I pick apart songs all the time though, and think the same way as DC "Hey they could have done this there," "or I would have put this in that part of the song. I am not very technical, but what I learn, I learn for good. That's just my way. I need a drum kit and a Bass guitar, so that I can continue into the next phase of being a musician.
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
Time is a death-lock of the mind, a corporeal, linear insurrection of the spirit.
Reply:96 days 18 hours 6 minutes ago
Member: Erk
    + 4  

544
WebCred
I don't know near as much theory as I wish I did. I've always been a more instinctual player than a schooled player and I've written what I think are some good songs. However, I realize that if I knew more theory I would have a much broader base of knowledge to work with.

To me, it's kind of like being a speech writer. If you have a basic knowledge of English you can write a speech, but the larger your vocabulary the more options you'll have to make your speech interesting.

Music is our language, theory is our vocabulary. Can you get by without it? Maybe, but I don't see how knowing more of it could possibly be a hindrance. Rarely a day goes by that I don't wish I had a deeper understanding of music theory. I just don't have the damn patience to sit down and learn it.
My music recommendations:
"Nobody understands me, but my guitar."
Reply:96 days 17 hours 12 minutes ago
Member: NoKindOfAMankind
    + 5  
635
WebCred
Hard to answer.... Think it's important to know about this, if you really wanna go somewhere. You say it feels sterile, but i think infact if you don't learn about those... all your improvised playing is gonna sound sterile & monotome.
My music recommendations: