Forums > Offbeat > So I checked out UG...
Jump:
Forums > Offbeat > So I checked out UG...
Original message:76 days 2 hours 43 minutes ago
+ 3  
1851
WebCred
...and so far it has given me a bad impression. I wasn't there an hour before I got in a PM argument with some guy who was convinced that there was such a thing as "more tone". Here, let me put it up:

Shane, what I meant in my comment about the VHT 50CL regarding the more gain you use the less tone you will have:

When you hear a player like Eddie Van Halen (back in the late 70's and early 80's) you notice how massive his lead tone is. How you can hear every single attack, screech, slide, etc. Thats cuz he is making it sound like that from his hands. His Marshall Super Lead allows him to showcase his vast control of dynamics because it derives most of its gain structure from the output trans.

Power tube gain is very different in how it responds to pregain. It is more unpredictable and complex. Preamp gain is an attempt at recreating power section like dynamics and compression but it is never as convincing.

When I said you lose tone I meant it. Let me give you an example. The more distortion you use the more every note you pick will sound uniformely the same. Many 'shred' types of today rely on thier pregain to play guitar. You know guys who NEED to have a ton of distortion to play something and make it smooth.

To me John Petrucci is liek this. His tone lacks any character. Every note he plays sounds the same. When I saw G3 with him and Vai, Satch I thought Vai's tone was head and shoulders above Satch or Petrucci. This is because Vai uses about a 3rd less pregain in his lead tone. Thats why you can hear every little subtle clickity clackity when he plays leads. You can hear all his pick attacks. Van Halen's old Marshall tone was like that too.

If you have ever played through a good JCM 800 head cranked to 11 you know it sounds exactly like old VH but though it is plenty of distortion, it is quite thumpy and unforgiving. In other words if you let some joe blow shred head plug into it, he would probably sound like a hack cuz you really need to be able to play guitar with attacjk and conviction to sound articulate and tonally sound with the cranked Marshall.

I have played for 27 years and can do all that shred stuff as well as a variety of other styles. I realize that tone is personal pref. I am just commenting on my experience with many amps and tones. Seems like alot of the younger guys playing guitar nowadays kind of don't get it regarding a good micd tone. You know they scoop the mids and use WAY too much pregain. The end result live is a buzzsaw guitar tone that is competing with bass and cymbols for its spot in the mix. Instead of sitting in the midrange frequency range.

But beyond all that, I am a firm believer if your power section isn't adding a proportion of power tube compression to your distorted tone, your tone will never really have 'legs'.

Its a weird phenomenon really. I mean what a power section can do for your sound. I learned first hand with an amp I used to own THD BIvalve. It cut through my band 10 times better than my last amp before that, and it didn't even need to be loud. I realized then that I had been a dummy my whole life about tone. I mean not realizing that the power section is what separates teh men from the boys.

Thats why great amps are expensive.

Ok sorry for the lecture, I am a fast typer.

Bruce

***********************************************************************
Wow. What a close-minded and totally convinced he's right individual. My last response was: "Really....and what unit of measurement do you use to measure tone?".

My argument with these boneheads is always that tone is subjective, just like art and women (or men, for you ladies). Everyone has a different opinion of what's good, therefore it's a highly subjective qualitative measurement, and not something you can ascribe a quantity to. Which means there is no such thing as "more" or "less" tone. Heck, even "better" or "worse" tone is up to the individual.

Anyway just thought I'd share.
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
Reply:76 days 2 hours 39 minutes ago
Member: Alski
    + 3  
410
WebCred
Heh, another fun experience in UG.
As for a unit of measurement, he measures tones in awesomeness.
My music recommendations:
myspace.com/alski0
Reply:76 days 2 hours 31 minutes ago
Member: Steve Aguilar
    + 3  
969
WebCred
" he measures tones in awesomeness" lmao nice
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
Balance is Key "You got spunk and ya got class kid, thats jazzy!" - My lame ass :D
Reply:76 days 2 hours 30 minutes ago
Member: pickabass
    + 3  
425
WebCred
From what i understand, you can replace a preamp section, and power amp with a computer and recording interface. Just a crazy notion of mine.
My gear recommendations:
  
Capos are for weenies
Reply:76 days 2 hours 30 minutes ago
Member: Fred Kraus
    + 2  
4456
WebCred
I don't understand. How can an artist be so one dimensional as to think there's only one path to great tone, or that there is only one kind of tone worth using? Am I understanding this correctly?
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
Reply:76 days 2 hours 26 minutes ago
Member: shanejohnson2002
    + 3  
1851
WebCred
That's what I got out of it. He seems like an alright guy, but his phrase "When I said you lose tone I meant it." kind of rubbed me the wrong way. I mean...really...mye englilshz idsunt thatte bayud, izzit?
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
Reply:76 days 2 hours 23 minutes ago
Member: Fred Kraus
    + 1  
4456
WebCred
iem noot refhdlly suge miselv!
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
Reply:76 days 1 hours 42 minutes ago
Member: bachmirage
    + 2  
1020
WebCred
i would also agree that "tone" is subjective. and style of music also plays a huge factor in determining the right sound. eddie's plexi sound would NOT work for say...slipknot. that sound is simply too thin for thrash type metal. but it IS an awesome sound. kind of a dissapointment when he went the 5150 way. i kind of thought he lost some aggression with that amp. then again he can make just about any amp he plays thru sing like a bird. now i saw dream theater about 6 weeks ago and petrucci tone/sound sounded like a million bucks to me. spot on. very clear. i would agree that too many younger inexperienced players tend to go for maximum distortion in situations where it is not needed and then they get lost in the mix. mids are definately your friend in the live application. and there is NO more or less "tone". that's just an inaccurate use of the word. many an arguement has been had here about the exact definition of the word "tone". too many ppl use it too loosely which is what causes all the ruckus in the first place. i personally choose to use the word "sound". that seems to clear up the argument quite nicely. too much buzzy distortion can make things SOUND unpleasant and quite nasty. but it does have it's place in certain genre's.

but trying to "measure" tone on any kind of scale is kinda silly. clearly the poster you argued with has NOT had the whole "TONE" arguement before as many of us have...and as such he has made the mistake of using the word "tone" so loosely as to offend you. and that happens. and it'll happen again. the real problem is the lack of terms out there that can be used to describe sound. tone just sounds like the right word when in fact it really isn't.
My gear recommendations:
  
Reply:76 days 1 hours 18 minutes ago
Member: Leif
    + 2  
985
WebCred
yes..he's a clown....but he's correct about power
supply "effecting" tone...

i.e. a nice clean tone will use a different
power supply then an amp that is based
on gain....yes its subjective BUT a fender
clean vs. a major power amp with gobs of
sustain will use a different power source

That's prett much what the guys at bogner told me
Scott, he makes the amps and he says he uses a
different power supply for his high gain amps...
he even had someone order a double power supply head..
two amps in one with different power supplies..
which was a strange request because it was so heavy
they said..

also i agree that a good portion if not most of your sound
comes from your fingers..sorry but its true. Also
certain amps expose your flaws..these are generally
the type of amps that have clear signals and also
excentuate your playing when your are playing well/

Also i agree with you guys tone is subjective...
but i think a lot has to do with the way you play and a
lot of your sound comes from your fingers and the way
you play..i'm sorry but thats true.

other than that he's an idiot and 90% of what he said is
assinine! there are so many quality amps with different types of tones.
alot of people bring it down to the three types of sounds that
amps are based upon.

hope you get what i'm saying...tone comes from your amp, guitar
and your fingers...

hope i didn't confuse you..i am saying its not a black and white response. everything matters!
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
Reply:75 days 21 hours 26 minutes ago
Member: NegativeGhostRider
    + 2  
683
WebCred
I have to diasgree. PERSONAL NUANCES come from your pick and fingers. Sustain also, to some degree. Tone is simply the character of a sound. "Harsh", "Bright", "Woody", etc and it is mostly affected by 3 things: the guitar itself, the amps, and the speakers.

There's a stupid old story about Ted Nugent playing on Van Halen's rig and still sounding like Ted. I can guarantee you the actual tonal quality of the instrument was still very similar if not identical to Eddie's. It sounded like Ted because of the little stylistic nuances each player throws in. That is really what defines us from one to the other.

I don't know...there's a lot of other things that are a lot more worth arguing about. For some reason this is one of my pet peeves.
My gear recommendations:
  
http://www.myspace.com/shanelovesguitar
Reply:76 days 46 minutes ago
Member: Steve Aguilar
    + 1  
969
WebCred
Yeah your right on that Leif IMO, a guy showed me at a local shp when I was playing how hard you attack the strings and your fretting of the frets if press down hard and strum you will go sharp, so it makes me wonder, I dont know the whole deal behind it but it makes sense.
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
Balance is Key "You got spunk and ya got class kid, thats jazzy!" - My lame ass :D
Reply:75 days 17 hours 33 minutes ago
Member: Johnny
    + 4  
1225
WebCred
i agree with the personal touch theory. if i play something on my guitar and then hand it to EVH or billy gibbons or nugent, and they play the exact same notes, it is still going to sound different. professional players just "have the touch" thats why they are professional players, and i am sitting here at my non music related job and typing on my comuter instead of sitting on a tour bus somewhere.
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
SUPPORT SOUTHERN ROCK
Reply:75 days 17 hours 27 minutes ago
Member: NegativeGhostRider
    + 3  
683
WebCred
Right, but the basic tonal qualities of the instrument will still be intact regardless of who's playing. That's the point I'm making. A telecaster will not sound like an ES335 no matter who's playing it. A marshall will not sound like a vox, a mesa, or a dumble.
My gear recommendations:
  
http://www.myspace.com/shanelovesguitar
Reply:75 days 17 hours 10 minutes ago
Member: Johnny
    + 2  
1225
WebCred
yeah i agree with that too. if that were not the case, they wouldnt need to make so many different kinds of guitars and equipment. im glad they do !!
My music recommendations:
My gear recommendations:
  
SUPPORT SOUTHERN ROCK